In reasons for judgment released today, the court in Rousta v. MacKay, 2017 BCSC 644, awarded the plaintiff $110,000 in non-pecuniary damages soft-tissue injuries, headaches, and dizziness sustained in a rear-end collision. The plaintiff in Rousta was 59 at the time of the accident and continued to experience pain at the time of trial. In giving reasons, Mr. Justice Skolrood wrote:
 The evidence establishes that the plaintiff suffered soft tissue injuries to her neck, shoulders and back as well as an injury to her right hip as a result of the accident. I accept her evidence that she still experiences pain in these areas, although I note the evidence of both Dr. Cameron and Dr. Dost that when they examined her, both in the summer of 2016, she had a full range of motion in her neck and back. A fair assessment is that these injuries will continue to cause her some pain and discomfort but are not by themselves disabling.
 The evidence also establishes that the plaintiff suffered an inner ear injury with resulting visual vestibular mismatch which continues to cause her difficulty, although not to the same degree as shortly following the accident. Again referring to Dr. Cameron’s and Dr. Dost’s examinations of the plaintiff in mid-2016, both indicated normal balance and coordination.
 The plaintiff has also experienced consistent headaches since the accident, and I am satisfied that they still continue to bother her, although Dr. Cameron and Dr. Barton are optimistic about improvement with better management.
 Considering the impacts of the accident on the plaintiff, the principles emanating from Stapley and the case authorities cited, I find that a reasonable award of non-pecuniary damages is $110,000.
The full decision can be found here: http://www.courts.gov.bc.ca/jdb-txt/sc/17/06/2017BCSC0644.htm